Sunday, January 20, 2008

Leaving Las Vegas


Let's react to the results of the Nevada caucuses and South Carolina Republican primary, shall we?
  • On the Democratic side of the Nevada caucuses, another solid victory for Hillary, especially when you break down the votes demographically. The delegate situation provides an interesting narrative in and of itself (namely, that Obama ended up receiving one more delegate than Hillary in Nevada), but that leads us to an entirely different, more complex discussion (coming up). Going forward, Obama finds himself in sort of a predicament: if he wins in South Carolina (which he is expected to do, and was affirmed by his 5-1 share of the black vote in Nevada), then he will regain a bit of momentum heading into February 5th, in which it's very likely both he and Hillary will come out of that primary event with a fairly equal share of delegates (thus, continuing on into the later primaries without a clear Democratic nominee); however, if Clinton manages to pull a true upset and defeat Obama in South Carolina, the Obama campaign will be wounded, limping into a February 5th primary that he will likely come out of too far behind a momentum-gathered Clinton. Therefore, it seems that the two potential big picture scenarios for the Obama campaign, based on a win or lose in South Carolina, is that he remains an equal with Clinton after Feb. 5th or he falls behind after Feb. 5th...in other words, how does Obama actually pull ahead of Clinton? I guess there is always the major campaign blunder moment (something a Clinton is not likely to commit), or the possibility that Obama actually does much better than expected on February 5th, something that seems to run counter intuitive to what one would expect in a 20+ national primary battle royale with a Clinton on the ticket. All that being said, I expect it will be the former situation where Obama indeed wins in South Carolina, both Clinton and Obama have relatively equal delegate counts after Feb. 5th, and the primary, once again, steams ahead without a clear front-runner. Finally, in what is a stunning outcome, John Edwards only managed to gather 4% support in the Nevada caucuses. This is cripplingly bad news for the Edwards campaign, who is going to have an extremely tough time here on out, especially in terms of fund raising and in convincing the voters that he's still a factor in this race (and, in the 'Edwards as Democratic convention power player' scenario, he's going to need a lot more than fifty-some delegates to have that kind of clout).
  • On the Republican side of the Nevada caucuses, Romney was more than expected to win here considering he was the only main candidate to campaign in the state (although, Ron Paul in a second place finish with 14% of the vote is really just amazing). More importantly, turning to the Republican primary in South Carolina, this was a pretty necessary victory for John McCain and this will definitely recharge his campaign going forward (we'll see if the Republican establishment is yet ready to rule), but even more interesting is what is going on beneath the surface with this outcome. For starters, it's certainly fair for Mike Huckabee to declare a semi-victory in South Carolina with only three percentage points separating him from a first place finish (and I'd like to think his comments about the Confederate flag and a religion-infused Constitution actually hurt him here, but it's pretty clear that such pandering is executed to actually boost one's self in a state like South Carolina...yuck). Thus, you have Mitt Romney with more "gold and silver medals" than any other candidate (hey Mitt, the Olympics in Salt Lake City were more than five years ago...get over it), John McCain with two victories and the fresh momentum, Mike Huckabee with one win and some close finishes, and Rudy Giuliani with a yet-to-be-tested Florida victory strategy...in other words, you have four candidates with four sets of math and, thus, four potential claims for ultimately ending up the Republican presidential nominee! Moving forward, this is only going to get more exciting, so buckle up. In other less significant news, Rep. Duncan Hunter has decided to drop out of the race after receiving less than a thousand votes in the South Carolina primary (personally, I think the story should be how the hell did he receive even that many!?), while Fred Thompson still refuses to see the political writing on the wall, probably because he misplaced his bifocals.
Now that is some thorough post-election analysis, if I do say so myself (which I indeed did just say so myself, so there you go). And now......drum roll, please......off to South Carolina for the Democrats and Florida for the Republicans!

2 comments:

Mr. Cooper said...

I'll probably write a little something about this later on, but I just thought I'd briefly respond to what you said. First of all, I agree that the NV delegate situation does make things interesting but the fact is that this was reported by the media (justifiably) as a firm Clinton victory and Axelrod spinning on the Sunday morning talk shows looked a bit desperate to me. Just an observation, I'm sure that won't have an impact, I'm just surprised they made it look like it was getting to them so much.

My feeling right now is that the race is not currently even -- Hillary is ahead, and not just slightly (though not by a lot either). The reason is because the high number of black voters in SC make that state almost a gimme for Obama now, so I think a victory down there might be written off a bit and not effect momentum going into February 5th, where I expect Clinton to take the major states. Here's how this might not happen: the Clinton campaign is giving eveyr indication they are going to seriously compete for a win in SC. I think this would be a knock-out punch for Obama, and I think Clinton would probably have the nomination sewn up by Feb. 5th if this were to happen. That said, the risk is also high, because it adds legitimacy to the Obama win if he can take SC. Should be an interesting few weeks.

As for the Republicans, I think we've got a McCain-Romney race now (unless Rudy somehow comes back in FL), with McCain definitely ahead. Huckabee, I think, is effectively done -- if he's not gonna win SC, where's he gonna win? He'll stick around and siphon votes, but I think his comments over the past week or so have dug himself too deep a hole.

CJ said...

The only thing I'd question is the characterization that Axelrod spinning about the delegate count was "desperate". This is exactly what Mark Penn was doing on the night of Obama's Iowa win, when Hillary got only one less delegate than Obama, and I don't remember the exact quote but it was something to the effect of "these elections are really about delegate numbers".

Now, you may think that Penn and Axelrod are both being desperate by doing this, but I think both were valid in pointing out the delegate aspect of the race, an aspect that will undoubtedly be an important focal point as the primary continues on to Feb. 5th. A win is a win for a first place finisher, and the headlines will always reflect that, but I think it's fair when the more complex, nuts-and-bolts side of the process is brought out, even when a campaign only brings it up with the intent to blunt the effects of an opponent's victory.

You can kind of see this also on the Republican side with Romney's delegate count over McCain, and his campaigns attempt to highlight his delegate numbers to blunt the two recent, headline-grabbing victories of the McCain campaign. Like you said, it doesn't usually have much of an impact, but these kinds of arguments will become more integral to the discussion if and when we get to the February and March primaries without clear delegate front-runners.